<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=whats-in-a-name</link>
	<description>Interactive marketing and e-commerce strategy blog for the local, mobile, social web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Make Money Online</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timpeter.dreamhosters.com/blog/?p=25#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>Commenting usually isnt my thing, but ive spent an hour on the site, so thanks for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenting usually isnt my thing, but ive spent an hour on the site, so thanks for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Check your assumptions at the door&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>thinks &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Check your assumptions at the door&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timpeter.dreamhosters.com/blog/?p=25#comment-243</guid>
		<description>[...] most interested in based entirely upon what they can share with friends. If we recognize Web 2.0 for enabling a shared experience and similarly recognize that the web remains only one channel in an increasingly multi-channel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most interested in based entirely upon what they can share with friends. If we recognize Web 2.0 for enabling a shared experience and similarly recognize that the web remains only one channel in an increasingly multi-channel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinks &#187; Are we getting ready to party like it&#8217;s 1999 again?</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>thinks &#187; Are we getting ready to party like it&#8217;s 1999 again?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 22:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timpeter.dreamhosters.com/blog/?p=25#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] Newsweek has decided to put Web 2.0 on its cover this week. Is it just me, or does the irrational exuberance of a few years back seem like it&#8217;s just around the corner again? I&#8217;m as keen to see a return to fun and excitement on the Web as anyone. I just worry that we&#8217;re about to see a whole bunch of folks repeat the mistakes of the past. At least this time, it seems that a number of folks are thinking through how to make money on the deal, instead of this &#8220;selling a dollar for 90 cents and make it up on volume&#8221; silliness we all dealt with the first time through. Tim Leberecht (who I&#8217;ve just started reading, thanks to Technorati), has a viewpoint on this, too, recapping the recent thoughts here about whether Web 2.0 can live up to its hype. Check it out. It&#8217;s worth the read. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Newsweek has decided to put Web 2.0 on its cover this week. Is it just me, or does the irrational exuberance of a few years back seem like it&#8217;s just around the corner again? I&#8217;m as keen to see a return to fun and excitement on the Web as anyone. I just worry that we&#8217;re about to see a whole bunch of folks repeat the mistakes of the past. At least this time, it seems that a number of folks are thinking through how to make money on the deal, instead of this &#8220;selling a dollar for 90 cents and make it up on volume&#8221; silliness we all dealt with the first time through. Tim Leberecht (who I&#8217;ve just started reading, thanks to Technorati), has a viewpoint on this, too, recapping the recent thoughts here about whether Web 2.0 can live up to its hype. Check it out. It&#8217;s worth the read. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timpeter.dreamhosters.com/blog/?p=25#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Agreed on all counts, Anne, as usual.  We&#039;re totally on the same page about this one with regard to what the meaning of this whole thing is.

I also continue to think there will be a killer app at some point.  Don&#039;t know what it is (obviously); I just feel confident that it&#039;s coming.

Keep up the great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on all counts, Anne, as usual.  We&#8217;re totally on the same page about this one with regard to what the meaning of this whole thing is.</p>
<p>I also continue to think there will be a killer app at some point.  Don&#8217;t know what it is (obviously); I just feel confident that it&#8217;s coming.</p>
<p>Keep up the great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Zelenka</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2006/01/29/whats-in-a-name/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Zelenka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timpeter.dreamhosters.com/blog/?p=25#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you&#039;re a stalker... I think you are a good judge of thinkers ;-)

It&#039;s clear to me something new is going on with Web 2.0, and people who say it&#039;s just hype can&#039;t see it for some reason. I agree, it&#039;s not so much the technology but the shift in how consumers meet the world; it&#039;s a social shift. I can&#039;t think of anything I&#039;d nominate for Web 2.0 killer app, but maybe that&#039;s because it&#039;s not primarily about technology. The various services that support us are necessary for the Web 2.0 revolution but they&#039;re not the revolution itself. The revolution is us! Power to and from the people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re a stalker&#8230; I think you are a good judge of thinkers <img src='http://www.timpeter.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear to me something new is going on with Web 2.0, and people who say it&#8217;s just hype can&#8217;t see it for some reason. I agree, it&#8217;s not so much the technology but the shift in how consumers meet the world; it&#8217;s a social shift. I can&#8217;t think of anything I&#8217;d nominate for Web 2.0 killer app, but maybe that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s not primarily about technology. The various services that support us are necessary for the Web 2.0 revolution but they&#8217;re not the revolution itself. The revolution is us! Power to and from the people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

