From the monthly archives:

August 2006

When people are your brand

by Tim on August 30, 2006

in Marketing

John Battelle reported that Danny Sullivan is leaving Search Engine Watch. Danny’s own site confirms it.
I’m stunned really. As one comment on John Battelle’s blog notes, “…for most people, Danny is SEW” and that Danny provided “…the main brand.” I agree completely, in this case if not universally. I was reading Jennifer Grappone and Gradiva Couzin’s new,and very useful, SEO bookthe other day and was struck by how many times the authors cited Danny, specifically mentioning Search Engine Watch only in relation to him. I will miss Danny tremendously in that context and am eager to see what he does next.

I think Danny’s departure is a perfect illustration of how people are the key to building great brands, particularly online. Obviously, you can’t build a great brand, online or otherwise, without the hard work of a good number of talented people. What I’m talking about in this instance, though, is how the names, faces, and personalities of individuals associated with a brand influence consumers’ perceptions of that brand. For instance, in the online space, potential customers typically never have met you. For most brands, it’s likely they never will. How do customers put a face to your name? In larger organizations, celebrity CEO’s do that job. Apple just added Eric Schmidt from Google to its board, gaining intellectual cred to go along with the intellectual capital he provides. Note that the press release emphasizes each brand’s commitment to innovation. Schmidt’s persona (and, by extension, Google’s reputation) benefits Apple’s brand by contributing to that. Still, it doesn’t only happen at the C-level with larger organizations. Many companies have successfully leveraged authority that individuals bring in order to provide a human face and increase the company’s credibility. Probably the most famous comes from the blogosphere: Robert Scoble. He brought a human element to Microsoft over the last few years. He softened Microsoft’s harder edges, countering the “win no matter what” ethos the company displayed prior to his arrival. Another fine example is Bradley Horowitzat Yahoo, who gives us all a little peek behind the curtain.

In light of the Danny Sullivan announcement, a more important question is why a company would risk endorsing a personality as a component of the brand when those personalities can simply walk away, taking the benefits they provide with them. As above, part of it is the halo effect those individuals provide. Google showcases smart people, Apple creative, JetBlue fun. Each of these contributes to consumers’ overall perception of the brand and aids its positioning in its customers’ minds. A bigger component online, though, is trust. Despite a Clickz News article today showing that consumers trust companies more than than previously expected, I believe it depends largely on the brand and the people behind that brand. I want to see which brands those are. I bet a chunk of those brands have a public face that drives that trust as much as any other component the company inherently provides. As Seth Godin notes today, the reverse is alse tru for brands and the personalities behind them. When someone’s face is attached to the product, his name is as much on the line as the brand itself. Would you rather trust a faceless corporate entity to look out for you, or someone who has attached her face, her name, her persona? Identity theft, phishing, spam, spyware, and related tactics limit consumers belief of the benefits e-commerce provides. Increasingly, trust will guide the actions of consumers online. Your team should reflect that. Think about who you have speaking on behalf of your brand online. What do they say about your brand? And, if no one’s speaking for your brand, why should I trust you?

{ 2 comments }

Best tip for selling online…

by Tim on August 23, 2006

in Marketing

I swore I would avoid a “Snakes On a Plane” post. Then Seth Godin had to go and ruin it for me. This might be my all-time favorite comment about selling (anything) on the Web (or anywhere else for that matter). Seth Godin has a brilliant piece about the perceived failure of “Snakes On a Plane”. While I don’t have a strong opinion about the movie one way or the other, I do think it’s interesting that it’s getting roasted by industry types because it didn’t come out of the blocks as strong as analysts expected. It’s interesting because it speaks to how expectations influence the perception of success and because it ignores the Long Tail. When the producers started making “SOAP,” I doubt they expected the buzz this movie would generate prior to its release. They probably thought they were just making another late-summer popcorn flick. Once the meme took off, though, people got way ahead of themselves in terms of thinking where this would end up. And now, they believe the phenomenon has come crashing back to earth. I’m not convinced. The movie has gotten generally positive reviews and it’s doing pretty well in the ’sphere lately. Check out Technorati’s chart of posts containing Snakes On A Plane per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Notice that jump to the right there. I don’t think that’s a movie breathing its last. Time, as always, will tell.

Back to Seth’s point, though. He hits it right on the head that having a great product is the key to your overall success. When I listed the four steps to successful selling online, I left that one out. Consider it the “zero-eth” step. Following steps 1-4 will only get you so far if you don’t offer the consumer value in the first place, whether that value derives from a cool consumer product, a useful business service, or a cheesy summer popcorn movie. Solve for that first. You can only put so much lipstick on a pig, after all. Or, in this case, a snake.

{ 0 comments }

Yeah! Anne’s back!

by Tim on August 18, 2006

in Blogging

OK, so I’ll admit Anne’s writing is sometimes “off-topic” to what I typically address; however, Anne Zelenka is one of the finest writers in the blogosphere. And, frankly, as Anne writes beautifully in her latest (long-awaited) post, “off-topic” is what makes life most interesting.

We, as marketers or e-commerce professionals, tend to think in terms of target consumers and target markets. We segment demographically, psychographically, and ethnographically. We covet cohorts. The problem is that those attempt to distill people solely into various “on-topic” groups. We ignore the “off-topic,” assuming it’s nothing more than outliers in the data. Even those who focus on personalization think of it in terms of behaviorially-targeted or product-focused segments. And, admittedly, marketers ignore data at their own peril. Personas and scenario-based design certainly offer a step in the right direction towards addressing customers as individuals. Anne’s singular point of view and clear voice remind me, though, that individuals are much more than a collection of facts and figures. Think about your customers the right way. Think about them as people.

Thanks for coming back, Anne. I’m thrilled you’re back.

{ 0 comments }

Pay attention. No, seriously. Stop doing other stuff and pay attention.

August 8, 2006 Marketing

Here’s a news flash: tomorrow’s adults don’t pay attention to any one thing at a time. This is not news, or shouldn’t be. But it definitely underscores how difficult it is to garner attention in the oversaturated, always-on environment of the post-media marketplace. In all this talk about Web 2.0 and convergence, [...]

Read the full article →