skip to Main Content

Was Drucker right after all?

Oh, Anne. I’m a huge fan. Always have been. Likely will remain so. You often provide amazing insight into the meaning of work in an increasingly connected society. Imagine my disappointment to see you take on Peter Drucker and find him wanting. Now, clearly, Drucker needs no defense. His writings stand on their own. But, I think you might want to examine the connection between the knowledge economy and the attention economy. They’re not as disconnected as you seem to think.

Here are four quotes from a piece Drucker wrote in 1996. I’ve emphasized key points, where appropriate.

“Charles Handy predicts that by the year 2000, practically nobody in the U.S. or U.K. will be an employee. I think that’s overreaching slightly. But the trend is clear: the employee society of organizations is mutating.”

While it doesn’t necessarily predict current working arrangement, Drucker recognizes the relationship between companies and employees will change. Further, Drucker recognizes the changing relationship between managers and employees, noting:

“We know that knowledge people have to be managed as if they were volunteers. They have expectations, self-confidence, and, above all, a network. And that gives them mobility…They carry their tools in their heads and can go anywhere.”

That sounds a fair bit like today’s web workers to me. Drucker continues, stating:

I think we are going to have to learn to develop more kinds of working options… And we need to provide them much earlier so that people want to stay involved but can also be mobile.”

Again, it doesn’t exactly mirror web work, but it recognizes the common themes. Finally, Drucker often discussed knowledge work in the context of a larger organization:

“…the first constant in the job of management is to make human strength effective and human weaknesses irrelevant. That’s the purpose of any organization, the one thing an organization does that individuals can’t do better. The second constant is that managers are accountable for results, period… And the last thing to say about what remains constant — actually, it will become even more relevant — is that people in developed societies will become increasingly dependent on access to an organization. Because they are specialists, they need access to the specialized knowledge of others in order to do a job.”

That sounds mighty collaborative to me.

Anne, I agree with your points about the ongoing change from a busy to bursty culture. I also agree you do not lack for insight. You may just lack enough Drucker in your library.

Tim Peter is the founder and president of Tim Peter & Associates. You can learn more about our company's strategy and digital marketing consulting services here or about Tim here.

This Post Has 0 Comments

  1. […] So, Anne and I continued the dialogue from the other day regarding Peter Drucker and paradigm shifts. While we’re not 100% aligned, one of the key points where we agree is that what defines an organization now is changing. Companies are (very, very slowly) shifting away from the last-century, hierarchical model of Drucker’s day, moving towards more transient and transparent arrangements among employers and employees. The future model that makes the most sense to me – and which definitely would represent a paradigm shift for most businesses – actually isn’t new, at least in one industry. Davidow and Malone talk about it in "The Virtual Corporation" from 1992(!), as does Tom Peters in the excellent "The Circle of Innovation". It’s the film industry. Many film “companies” leverage the talents of free agents who come together only for the time it takes to complete their production, after which most move on to their next project. The “group-based, collaborative, wisdom-of-crowds” approach Anne points out definitely seems to require these fluid connections, where each member belongs to the “organization” only as long as necessary. This “free agent nation” definitely doesn’t mirror where most folks work today, but it certainly seems to signal where we’re going. […]

  2. Is the connected age eliminating the reality of the information age?…

    Anne and I debated information workers vs. web workers some time back (you can review Anne’s side of the argument here and here and see my arguments here and here). Now, Anne seriously ups the ante over at GigaOM, making a strong case for what&#…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back To Top
Search