<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there such a thing as &#8220;too much SEO?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2009/06/22/is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2009/06/22/is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-seo/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-seo</link>
	<description>Interactive marketing and e-commerce strategy blog for the local, mobile, social web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan Petracco</title>
		<link>http://www.timpeter.com/blog/2009/06/22/is-there-such-a-thing-as-too-much-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Petracco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timpeter.com/blog/?p=722#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m now hearing &quot;page rank sculpting&quot; used to describe the practice of building internal links to your higher-converting pages - rather than to describe the use of nofollow attributes on links to less important pages. Upon reading this description, I felt like the author (whom I very much respect) was trying to redefine the term in order to backtrack on previous stances about nofollowing links working well for SEO. It was a bit disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now hearing &#8220;page rank sculpting&#8221; used to describe the practice of building internal links to your higher-converting pages &#8211; rather than to describe the use of nofollow attributes on links to less important pages. Upon reading this description, I felt like the author (whom I very much respect) was trying to redefine the term in order to backtrack on previous stances about nofollowing links working well for SEO. It was a bit disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

